Implementing the Water Environment and Water Services Scotland Act 2003
7. Objectives of and criteria for SUD systemsThe Scottish Executive considers that it could be valuable to have a set of objectives incorporating the standards which SUD systems in public spaces should meet if they are to be patagonia capilene size guide1adoptpatagonia capilene size guide0ed by Scottish Water.The question to be considered here is whether there should be SUDS Regulations. The SfS 2 manual identifies detention basins and retention ponds as being effective SUD systems. This does not preclude the adoption of other types of system, but the onus is on developers to show that any other proposed system is the correct solution for that site and will help control the flow of water and mitigate diffuse pollution without undue risks. Any alternative design would also be subject to SEPA appropatagonia capilene size guideval.The treatment volume, which is a prime criterion for the size of a retention pond, is basediscount patagonia babyd on the area of the surface that is drained and on other characteristics such as soil type and rainfall that may be expecpatagonia capilene size guide2ted in a defined storm. It should be calculated by a recognised method. In some circumstances, such as where an industrial estate is drained the pond may need to be as much as 3 or 4 Vt to bring about good water quality. The regulatory body with the remit to ensure the type of SUDS is appropriate for protection of the environment under WEWS Act is SEPA, and developers and Scottish Water should be guided by SEPpatagonia nano puff hoody reviewA, especially in these circumstances.In the Scottpatagonia capilene size guide3ish Executive s view, these high level standards should give an assurance to developers that if they comply with them, and with any provision in the agreement (approval letter) entered into patagonia guide pants vs pumpsbetween them and Scottish Water, the SUD system will be vested in Scottish Water. All systems would be subject to the standards in the proposed SfS 2 on appropriate construction requirements and to an examination of suitability for the particular site. It would be advantageous if approval or agreement in principle that a development s SUDS will be vested in Scottish Water were to be reached at an early stage.Appropatagonia atom sling quickval letters would constitute agreements between Scottish Water and developers individually. Agreements have the capacity to achieve the objectives listed above without the need for legislation. There ispatagonia discount code nfl the necessity to ensure that all parties are confident that the conditions of such agreements are robust, including the environmental regulator patagonia discount code 83SEPA, as that Agency may require. Agreements would also mean depatagonia everlong review boostvelopers would be given assurances at an early stage, and this would ensure that developers could build with confidence of vesting on completion. Scottish Water would also be in a position to expect that their future asset would be fit for purpose. Agreements can be expected to deliver the benefits that regulations would offer, and have the advantage of being adaptable to specific circumstances by agreement.The Executive has considered criteria for public SUDS, such as: not cause flooding, provide 1 Vt in a pond or series of ponds, not be dangerous, provide a sedimentation forebay or equivalent sedimentation feature etc. It would be feasible to make these criteria statutory requirements, but the Executive s view is that they should be given as guidance; it is not necessary to set them in legislation.QUESTION 5. Are you content with these criteria and that they should be adopted through SfS 2? If not, what alternatives would you proposepatagonia girls jackets for cheap? Do you consider that they, or any of them, should be stpatagonia jewelry unlimitedatutory? Is there a need to have regulations to apply these criteria?
